Showing posts with label folklore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label folklore. Show all posts

Saturday, 17 June 2023

Hex Crawl 23 #168: Judgments of Aish Mashuila: Wisdom of the Crocodile Judge

Eleven hexes north, three northwest of Alakran.

 

The ascension of the reptilian Korth to the Judgeship of the Balance led many to whisper, with some awe, of the wise rulings attributed to the legendary Crocodile Judge.  This judge was a Subek, a crocodile-person of the same species as Hebat whom we have already met. Their proper name and gender are not generally known but surely can be found in the temple rolls.

The most popular story concerns a fish. After gaining a reputation for deduction and encyclopedic knowledge of the law, the Judge faced a case that depended on insight into the human character, which was not so easy for a crocodilian. 

A husband and a wife of Shasari accused each of the infanticide of their second son. Both seemed sincere in their denials, both spelled out a tale of why the other would want to do it. The reasons were personal and neither family members nor servants could shed any light.

"In times like this, in my city," growled the Judge with a throat ill-suited for human speech, "we seek the aid of a magical fish, who can smell lies on a person's fingers. Go home, return in a week, and I will have fetched the fish from its home."

The next week, the contending couple returned and found a bronze bowl filled with water before the Judge's seat, which rippled and bubbled every so often. 

 "This is the fish Abtu who swims in the sacred pool," said the Judge, and proceeded to demonstrate by asking the bailiff to tell the truth, and thrust his right hand in the bowl, then a lie, and follow with his left hand, which he withdrew bleeding.

"Now each of you say, 'I did not kill the child known as Red Grass Garland', and put your hand in the bowl."

So the husband did, and came out intact; but before the wife could be tested, she broke down crying, and confessed to the crime.

The following year, the fish was brought out again, for a case in which a golden urn had disappeared from a house. All the servants denied the wrong, though they were questioned severely, as servants might be. "One of these must be an expert liar," said the Judge, "for either one has stolen it or the night watch has allowed it." This time he put the bowl behind a screen, and bid each of the dozen suspects proceed behind and present their hand to the fish.

"Your Honor," said the bailiff when all were done, "the case remains a riddle. None of these people has  blood on their hands."  

"Look again," rasped the Crocodile Judge, "look carefully to see whose hands are dry."

And so the culprit was caught, and seeing no recourse, confessed in hope of mercy.

After some generations passed, the nature of this magic fish became clear in the retelling. Despite the cleverness of the Judge, who had asked the bailiff to cut his left hand with a shard of glass that lay in the bowl, the high court of the land no longer could trust that a magic fish, or a magic bell, or a magic doll, or magic sticks, could be used to discern one guilty person out of several. 

And yes, zone of truth is banned from the campaign, as it should be.


 

Wednesday, 7 June 2023

Hex Crawl 23 #158: Judgments of Aish Mashuila: A Double-Header from Shakalul

 Twelve hexes north of Alakran.

 

Among these sleepy villages, Shakalul is the one with a story of judgment to tell. It belongs to the time of the Band of Bronze, and of the Khilan priest Korth's ascension as Judge of Balance after the defeat of Azeneth. But -- because at the time of our survey, the Band's deeds are in the future -- a visit to Shakalul itself will acquaint travelers with the strange tale of the son, or sons, of Hahharti the roof-builder.

Hahharti had already two daughters, but after his son was born he begged of his wife, "One more!" For the infant was one child with two heads, or two twins with one body -- a debate expected to be moot, for such prodigious births did not live long in the midwife's experience. But the child, or children, confounded expectations and grew to adulthood, while the wife could not comply with her husband's wish, for she died of a lingering childbed fever. Although called by one child-name, the adult heads preferred different names -- the left going by Amur, the right by Ashur.

The conundrum that confronts visitors today is simply that Hahharti is seeking a wife, or wives, for Amur-Ashur so that his trade, which he taught the son(s), may continue. There is an eligible lass, Tupalli, daughter of a wall-builder. The union would augur in a construction dynasty for the ages! Yet Tupalli fancies Amur, but is indifferent to Ashur, and before that conundrum can even raise its head the village elder, the keen-eyed centenarian Dumanima, has forbidden the marriage as the result of reasoning that goes like this:

1. If there is marriage among Tupalli, Amur, and Ashur, then the marriage would be biandry, which is most unnatural and unconventional.

2. If Tupalli marries Amur but not Ashur, then Ashur would either be a participant in their sexual congress, which is adulterous, or a spectator thereto, which is voyeurism and also a misdeed.

3. Reinforcing point 2, if Tupalli consents to congress with both, it is an orgiastic misdeed, but if she consents to congress with only one, the other would nightly commit a violation.

Anyone who solves this riddle by suggesting a way for the marriage to proceed lawfully and morally will gain both the gratitude of Hahharti and a plot of land worth 100 gold that is coming to him as part of the dowry, as well as a reputation throughout the land as a wise and benevolent lay judge. The best way is to convince Dumanima that the two men are in fact one person, but this will not be easy. Certainly when Amur-Ashur's two sisters came before Judge Korth after the death of their father, requesting a third instead of a quarter of the inheritance due them all, the wise judge noted that the two men had different names, and different tastes, and therefore were owed a half instead of a third share. But different judgments are indeed possible.